The Sun is the main driver of climate change. Not you. Not carbon dioxide.

The Most Important Reasons Why There is No Climate Emergency – Dr. Roy Spencer – Jan. 19, 2021 at 7pm MST

Get your tickets now for Part 2 of Friends of Science Society’s 17th Annual Event with Dr. Roy Spencer and “The Most Important Reasons Why There is No Climate Emergency”. The event will be online in a live stream of a recorded presentation followed by live Q&A. Part 1 aired Dec. 8, 2020 with Donna Laframboise.


Best deal! Friends of Science Society members have unlimited access to viewing these on-line events – Become a Member!

The current claims of a “climate emergency” are shown to be gross exaggerations. Recent warming of the climate system has been modest and benign, and at the low end of the warming predicted by the computerized climate model projections used to guide changes in national energy policy. Climate model projections of human-caused climate change are based upon the assumption that climate does not change naturally, and so represent an example of circular reasoning. From sea level rise to wildfires to severe weather, there has been little to no change observed which is outside the realm of natural variation. Thus, the “climate emergency” claims are not based upon science.

About the speaker
Roy W. Spencer received his Ph.D. in meteorology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1981. Before becoming a Principal Research Scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville in 2001, he was a Senior Scientist for Climate Studies at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, where he and Dr. John Christy received NASA’s Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal for their global temperature monitoring work with satellites. Dr. Spencer’s work with NASA continues as the U.S. Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA’s Aqua satellite. He has provided congressional testimony several times on the subject of global warming.

Dr. Spencer’s research has been entirely supported by U.S. government agencies: NASA, NOAA, and DOE. He has never been asked by any oil company to perform any kind of service. Not even Exxon-Mobil.

Dr. Spencer’s first popular book on global warming, Climate Confusion (Encounter Books), is now available at and

Get your tickets Now!


  1. Dr Francis Manns

    Mind you there has been warming since the Little Ice Age and it has been captured and misinterpreted by climate modelers. To my knowledge there has never been experimental support for the anthropogenic hypothesis so it stands even with all other hypothesis having no support but opinion.

  2. Bob graham

    And yet most govts support the AGW fraud. Guess it worked for the king who had no clothes, but i hoped we were slightly more aware now.

  3. Steve Case

    Sea level will be covered. Good

    Will methane (CH4) and the ridiculous Global Warming Potential (GWP) numbers be covered?

    That issue should be covered as methane is being regulated i.e., Natural gas in new residential construction banned in California. Attempting to regulate CH4 emissions from live stock, gas wells, land fills etc. The future global temperature rise due to CH4 is NEVER discussed anywhere, policy makers need to know how little it is. Probably in the neighborhood of 0.05°C or essentially nothing.

  4. Joel O'Bryan

    Your point is why Kevin Trenberth and others have attempted to reverse the Null Hypothesis in the eyes of the science and the public on the nature of why Earth’s global climate has warmed since 1970’s. They want skeptics to prove it wasn’t rising CO2 that did it and not natural internal cycles or solar forcing. They have to do things like continually introduce new adjustments to the observational land station temps and SST records of the late-19th Century and first half of 20th Century to maintain something that doesn’t immediately falsify the model outputs. The manipulations of aerosols in the climate models 20th Century to help “calibrate and validate” them only means they run far too hot into the 21st Century where our observations of global aerosols are robust with global satellite coverage. This situation of cargo cult science can only get worse for them, hence the need for a disinformation campaign run by “climate communications” programs and the need to reverse the Null hypothesis of global warming.

Leave a Reply! Please be courteous and respectful; profanity will not be tolerated.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!